Helen Stratford

The global solution of all problems, a new world of “Renewable means of payment” (Google) an official is always acquis, and which is maintained – political candidates are both candidates for the Office of the President, and both come from almost the same political camp. Both are conservative and bourgeois. To deepen your understanding Pop star is the source. Obviously, Mr. Gauck has the great sympathy with Mr Wulff is only a friendly and nice person in the people. Conservative comes from the Latin conservatism, and in the political means: attitude, which grows from the pursuit for life and safety and is therefore committed to the preservation of the political and social conditions. Lexicon citizens comes from the monarchy: term for a city’s inhabitants today State. Jessica Michibata may also support this cause. In ancient times, citizens are residents of a city-State with rights to the political self-government. In the middle ages-free landowners in a city.

Citizens also can be Horige(Volk), which can escape from a town and are located in a different city. Citizens are guaranteed Rights, they are free from taxation, military and judicial review powers outside their community. They are categorized in guilds, guilds and political groups within their community. Lexicon unfortunately is not so perceived the preservation by the keepers, the Conservatives, as it is in the encyclopedia. Just we can see again, as Conservatives on the social status of the little people, screw the people towards down and just we can see again, as they their own status, the safeguard of the citizens, the assets (untaxed), and it’s practiced conservatism and middle-class, that we experience as live. The conservative is – how could it be otherwise, ultimately the citizen who respects his rights and preserves and they assault, Andersgesinnten, of the members of the common people protects against. Defend vested rights and this is correct in the sense of the Constitution. The people is actually the togetherness of all citizens – at least it should be.

To overcome the deficit of each year 30,000 births in Austria Austria, the reproductive rate of its population by approximately 30% is less than 3 decades. There is a lack of 30,000 births per year. In the past 10 years alone, 300,000 people who have not come to the world in Austria are this. If nothing happens, the Austrian population towards the extensive self extinction is located. Austria has an extensive family support in an international comparison. This is lower than in Austria such as France or Sweden in part, however, these States have more births than we (France for example 2.01 children per woman compared to 1.39 children per woman in Austria). The resources available are used apparently better than ours.

In Austria, the financial, professional, and social disadvantages associated with children are just too big for the majority of our population. Related Group spoke with conviction. The financial disadvantage of 3 children (up to 17 years) amounts currently accumulated to approximately 380,000 euros. Children must be an advantage both socially and financially. “Objective of the referendum survival of our Austria” it’s again a boost to convert the current downward spiral in our population. The instrument cases is a constitutional law, which contains a mission statement, which lacks today – for the development of Austria’s population. “The text of the referendum is: the National Council may decide by federal constitutional law, that is to maintain the current composition of the Austrian population ( 1) ( 2) the family support including accompanying regulations are to the reconciliation of child-rearing and career so designed, that Austria renewed its population from its own offspring ( 3) offset the income losses relating to the education of children.” It comes to compensate for the income losses in connection with children and the full compatibility to establish between work and parenting, to have for all children (married or unmarried) to develop an economic advantage, to secure our pensions through their own children, our economy in the future sufficient own workers and consumers to make.

Measures for this purpose are in particular: the distribution of wages of parents on all children as in France. This results in a decreasing tax burden: the more children less income tax. Benefits for parents with children in the pension contributions, when the pension amount or at the retirement age; decide financial and professional incentives for women who earlier than this currently is the case in their limited time precluded – for children; the complete achievement of reconciliation of child-rearing and work through childcare facilities (full day kindergarten, all-day school) are synchronized with the working time; Compensation reduced career opportunities; Equality of People with children with people without children in the practical life; Acquisition of additional costs for the creation or rental housing for children. an ideal vision is also essential: presentation of overcoming the birth deficit as the objective of our society; Priority for the contract of the generation in the hierarchy of social action; Rehabilitation of essential for our survival role of women as a mother; Overcoming their degradation as this was already heard, as machine.

Closing speech of the campaign ‘Social & fair’ in Berlin: despite partisan differences politicians FDP, SPD, Greens and left party represented in the Berlin House of representatives have lobbied for an improvement of the working conditions of professional caregivers / students. At the final rally of the nationwide campaign social & fair social policy spokesperson of the SPD Bundestag group, ulker stimulated Radziwill, a Federal Council initiative, which was welcomed by the other politicians. At the heart of claims by the Federal Association of professional caregivers (BdB), whose targeting of Potsdamer Platz in Berlin to end went, are funding the actually necessary working time per client, an increase in the remuneration at least 50.00 net per hour and recognition of work done as a profession, as a qualification for a master’s degree must be demonstrated. Wage increase indirectly reach the social politician and member of the Berlin Government left, Minka Dott, is, however, given the budgetary constraints not Possibility for an increase in the remuneration. She wanted are struggling however to change the care hours, to get a pay rise by this indirect route”. So far the legislators for the legal assistance per client provides only two to three hours enough for tasks such as accounting, correspondence with social services or care funds and the personal care of needy people, for whom the professional carers employed by the care judges care. working time per month.

Therefore, according to the politicians on the BdB event, the generalization in favor of individual solutions should be abolished. Quickly organize Symposium on the way then the parliamentarians with specific offers enthusiastic: ulker Radziwill Jasenka Villbrandt (Alliance 90/Greens) want in the next four weeks a Conference organize and on the should be discussed, which the demands of professional caregivers can be implemented promptly. And the FDP-politician for Federal issues, Sylvia Maria von Stieglitz, wants to include Federal Justice Minister Sabine Leutheusser-Schnarrenberger into the topic of professional care, since the legal aspects of nationwide have relevance. The Berlin land Chairman of the BdB, Thomas Behrendt, was impressed by the action joy of the politicians, working as a professional caregiver but also referred to his experiences from more than ten years: so long it costs nothing, may we always be easy an opinion “.” However he welcomed the suggestion to a Federal Council initiative explicitly: our hourly rate is based on a ten-year-old establishment.

election. But how does manipulation on legal work? Of course, you say, with the help of the right. Effective discrimination of the poor of America in this country relatively incomprehensible, it is necessary to themselves before elections in the United States as voters register. And just this registration is trying to take advantage of the Republicans in a broad campaign to decide the US election 2012 in their favour to kurenden candidates. For this purpose, were and are laws in numerous Republican governed States of the United States, which clearly exacerbate the existing terms and conditions. For one, the new rules massively hinder the work of very traditional in the United States non-profit societies to the voter registration. In addition a special, with picture proof of identification is required now in many places by the choice of complying.

Both measures aim so clearly how effective on a specific population group, which includes 11 percent of potential U.S. voters, at least 21 million people, according to reliable estimates about. “I don’t want that everyone chooses.” These are the poor of America, where simply the requirements to apply for a such registry permission card to the U.S. election missing, because for example they neither yet about a birth certificate have a driver’s license picture. This population group had agreed to the US election 2008 in far greater numbers than usual to register and then almost invariably for Obama. Orchestrated is this cross-State legislative initiative by the “American legislative Exchange Council” (ALEC), a very influential Association of Republican politician and industrialist. There, and with the supporters of the new regulations measures – ironically – be justified with improved protection against electoral fraud. However such finds, based on the registration in the United States actually as well as not take place. A famous saying of the founder of ALEC, Paul Weyrich, however, speaks volumes about the spirit behind this muted constitutional, discriminatory election manipulation: “I don’t want everybody to vote.” (“I don’t want that everyone chooses.”) Again brings us unclear Jamon at Joss – is who in This sophisticated crooks play of the Lucky Luke is. Andreas Kellner…