Helen Stratford

For example, even small children know what to see next, we must rise above. However, even they know that had to rise above and sometimes in order to see deeper, for example, in water, the submarine. But, of course, only in later life to the people comes the understanding that the right path in life you can see, only rising to the appropriate height. This is not just a theoretical discussion. After all, perhaps, no small number of people on some perfect their stupidity in practice have heard comment: "You that he did not know … ' This, of course, this comment implies that the time to draw conclusions from the knowledge of what is no longer possible to disown a long time has come. Therefore, only by some supernatural causes, and only believers can justify misunderstanding that it was not any movement forward is good. For example, as pointed out by the same William Shakespeare, those who are merely 'sins of the fathers are doing in a new way', if you go ahead and then just in the wrong direction.

Same direction, which must go all people, regardless of differences in religion and in respect to faith in general, quite clearly and accurately marked in the Bible (1 Fel.5, 21): "Prove all things, a good stay." 'Only stupid repeats folly (Proverbs 26.11) "and not just their own. This, expressed in the Bible direction moves by nature. Anyone can see that in nature there are, and sterile, and other manifestations of violations of its move.

But in this sonnet infinitive "to behold" was written by Shakespeare and another in conjunction with "as". In short, every person possessing the essence of man, it should be understood that the meaning of this combination "as to behold" must thoroughly investigate and that the proceeding requires some effort. Of course, probably not humanly categorically state that none of the readers or interpreters of this sonnet is making no effort to understand its meaning. But from these examples it is clear that their efforts proved to be quite enough. However, some readers have gone further. Unable to understand the meaning of the sonnet or obviously wanting it failed to do and all other readers, those few readers have gone on line fraud, the obvious villainy in relation to Shakespeare. They have become imprinted on the second line of the original sonnet comma after the word "as". The author of this note can immediately agree that the absence of a comma after "as" in the text of the sonnet in the first edition in 1609 due to only the general sloppiness of this publication, carried out is believed to be without the participation of the author of this sonnet.

The author of this notes immediately agree that the lack of adequate places just overlooked the people initiating the second edition of sonnets in 1640 (!) year, though the dedication of this edition indicates that people realize it really was loved and Shakespeare understood the way it does not like and do not understand until now. But the author of this article agree with this only on one condition – if he produces at least some, at any time, printed in England, a text in which the presence of comma after "as" not recognized as a clear typographical error or an obvious ignorance. In some responses to some of the author's note he mentioned the illegal rude epithets by which he rewards the translators Shakespeare and the people who read and read these works in their original language. The author points out that it was his rudeness often prevents accept his arguments, no matter how conclusive they are. And the author of this note these guidelines take into account the possibility of trying. But in this article should just bluntly state that the lack of understanding of the sonnet 66 by William Shakespeare, or reflect the wildness, inhumanity and its readers and interpreters, or clear their meanness. And the distance between the first and the last two qualities – only one printed sign.